MSU Student has Mouth Stapled Shut

A Danger of Religion

Edit: As more details of this story have come out, I have amended my title and removed the words “because of his religion” from the end of the title. It remains unclear if this attack was a hate crime.  More information on this story can be read here: http://www.freep.com/article/20120829/NEWS06/120829044/Zachary-Tennen-Bruce-Tennen-MSU-assault-anti-Semitic-hate-crime?odyssey=nav|head (located by Reddit user Herxheim)

I came across the following story while surfing the web this morning: Jewish Student Says Attackers Stapled His Lips Shut (www.yahoo.com).  That link does not tell us too much, but is worth calling attention towards as I will point out later.  A more detailed story can be found here.  The basic gist of the story is as follows, a Michigan State student, Zachary Tennen, was a block party this past weekend.  A few guys came up to him and asked him if he was Jewish.  He replied that he was.  They then raised their arms into a Nazi salute, said “Heil Hitler” and proceeded to beat him up, knock him out, and staple his lips and gums together.  Tennen is at home after having surgery to wire his broken jaw shut, eating through a straw.  There is also a story out that the offenders claimed to be members of the Ku Klux Klan, though that is unconfirmed at this time.  Police are out looking for the offenders and apparently have some leads.

As of this time, the only story we have is that of Tennen’s.  I suppose we will learn more as the police investigation continues and more witnesses are found.  Here is what I find troubling, the little news blip from Yahoo above ends with the following statement:

“The East Lansing police department said in a statement to ABC News today that they do not believe the assault was a hate crime.”

Huh?  How can they not be treating this as a hate crime?  The only reason the above tragedy could not be considered a hate crime would be if Tennen is lying.  We have no reason to believe he is lying at this point.  I must admit this leaves me confused…what is required for something to be considered a hate crime if the above story does not meet the criteria?  Don’t bother to answer; I am calling bullshit on that stance.

People often ask me “what is your problem with religion”.  In a very simplified nutshell, it is stories like the one above.  If we advanced as a society and removed the virus of religion from our midst, attacks like the one detailed above would not occur.  How many similar stories are there of people being abused because of either their religious faith or because of the attacker’s faith?  The list would be endless.  Religions, by their nature, breed competition with other religions.  After all, there can only be, at most one right answer to the “big questions” (I believe religion is lacking when it comes to those answers).   Each religion claims to have THE answer for how we got here, what our purpose is, etc.  Each religion is certain of the answers it provides.  Certainty does not lead to compromise and mutual respect, it leads to digging in your heels at all costs.  When I know I am right about something, and by that I mean 100% certain, I don’t back down.  Do you?  By its nature, religion claims to be 100% on most everything it discusses.

This competition between religious claims obviously does not always have to end in violence.  I am an atheist, my neighbor to the right is a Lutheran, the one to the left is a member of a Christian church that I don’t really understand or know about, the people down the street are Jewish.  We all get along fine, every day.  However, religious competition can lead to violence.  It can lead to feelings of righteousness and even hate (evidence of this can be seen in the types of stories similar to Tennen’s).  This is one of my major problems with religion.  It does not inspire a general feeling of community with all of our neighbors, but rather, with only the “right” neighbors.

Stories like the one above, at least in mind, wipe out all of the good things that religions do in our communities.  Without a doubt, many of the local churches in my areas do some great things.  They volunteer and donate to homeless shelters and soup kitchens, for example.  My position is that we do not religions to do those things.  Secular groups do the same type of work.  In some cases, such as with orphanages and health care, secular groups do a better job.  If we were to eradicate our society of religion, I do not think the poor and otherwise needy among us would be any worse off.  The harm that is done in the name of religion, and this post only deals with one type of harm out of many, is not effectively counterbalanced by the good done in the name of religion.  Religion erodes society like a cancer.  It is time we cut it out.

Thanks for reading.  I look forward to your comments.

—-RB

If you have a blog please feel free to promote it on my “Promote Your Blog” page above.

If you would like to share your story of how you became an atheist, please do that on my “Share your Atheism Story” forum.  Our stories may help to encourage others with similar feelings to know that life is more than just okay without god(s).

If you have not yet checked out Alltop.com’s Atheism Blogs….what are you waiting for?

 

4 thoughts on “MSU Student has Mouth Stapled Shut

  1. Loren Miller from Princeville, HI, United States

    Ye have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy neighbour, and hate thine enemy. But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you…"
    – Matthew 5:43-44

    To any self-respecting christian, I would hope that this would be at minimum, a significant contributor to their belief system as well as an influence on their behavior. Yet the verbal rancor and worse behavior, as exemplified in your post, seem to be occurring more and more often. Certainly, atheists deplore such incidents and we have no problem about speaking out about and against them. Accuse me of having my ears selectively plugged if you want, but I really don't hear the same level of outcry from the christian community at large.

    Sometimes I think the biggest shame among christians is the difference between talking the talk and walking the walk.

    Reply
    1. Hausdorff from Troy, MI, United States

      The problem is it is a big book of multiple choice. If you want to be nice to people you can find verses like that one. If you want to be violent you can find plenty of verses for that too. For example

      "Do not think that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I have not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I have come to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law"
      Matthew 10:34-35

      So does walking the walk mean you should love your enemy, or does it mean you should kill anyone who doesn't love Jesus, even if they are your family? There are enough contradictions and opposing viewpoints in the bible it seems that you can make a case for anything.

      Reply
      1. Loren Miller from Princeville, HI, United States

        Yeah, I know, Hausdorff … and one of the biggest contradictions for me is Luke 6:27 vs. Luke 19:27. That one right there should disqualify the bible all by itself, though you and I both know it doesn't to those who believe the bible as the "word of god." Any "enemy" with even a modicum of brains looking at those two verses would instantly realize he was dealing either with a bipolar freak or a victim of Dissociative Identity Disorder … and likely head for the hills.

        Maybe THIS is why they all cherry-pick the bible. If they took the whole thing, imagine the confusion! [chuckle!]

        Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

CommentLuv badge