Richard Mourdock is a Better Christian Than Most

Christians Must Agree with Mourdock’s Rape Comments

There has been quite a firestorm this week regarding the comments made by GOP Indiana Senate Candidate Richard Mourdock.  His comment, according to the debate transcript was:

“I’ve struggled with it myself for a long time, but I came to realize life is a gift from God and I think even when life begins in that horrible situation of rape, that it is something that God intended to happen.”

The issue I have with the expected firestorm is the nature of the criticism and not the criticism itself.  Some GOP candidates have tried to distance themselves from Mourdock and Democrats are pouncing on this issue like hungry cats.  All of the criticism (or lack of criticism from some on the Right) is failing to address the main issue here.  The main issue that we should be discussing is that Christians, or at least “good” and devout Christians MUST agree with Mourdock’s statement.  Their only other options are to admit that they are not very devout, do not understand their faith, or, in fact aren’t really Christian.  The good news for me as an atheist, is that I have no problem labeling Mourdock the lousy steaming pile of dog shit on a cold day that he is.  Christians cannot do this.  Let me explain.

Christians believe that their god has a few characteristics.  Among those characteristics are that he is an eternal Creator, omniscient, omnipresent, omnipotent, and omnibenevolent.  There is nothing controversial about what I am saying regarding their god.  Let us look at each of those in the context of a rape induced pregnancy.

Christians believe that their god has always existed and always will exist.  He is eternal.  On top of this, he is the Creator of all things.  So, this god naturally created the rape victim, the rapist, and the soon to be child.  This is why Christians hold life so sacred.  They believe that god created ALL of it.  Including the three parties involved in this story.

Second, Christians believe their god is omniscient.  When we couple with his eternal nature a few things become apparent.  An eternal and omniscient god will know everything that is going to happen eternally.  He knows all from our past and all from our future.  He always knew this.  He did not learn what the future will be.  The future is something that he always knew.   So when we look at the case of rape and rape induced pregnancy, the Christian must admit two things.  First, that god KNEW that this rape was going to happen (and a child would result from it).  Second, he KNEW this when he created both our female rape victim and her male rapist.  If he is an eternal creator and omniscient he KNEW this was going to happen.  A “good” Christian must accept this or admit that their god is not an eternal Creator and is not omniscient.  There is no middle ground.

Third, Christians believe their god is omnipresent.  This is why prayer is so important to them.  God is always present in their lives and knows what is going on every second of every day.  This is why even impure thoughts are seen as sins.  He is always present and knows all.  In the context of rape, the Christian must admit that their god was present at the time of the rape.  They have no other choice except to admit that their god is not omnipresent.

Fourth, Christians believe that their god is omnipotent.  They believe that their god can do anything.  This is why we have the concept of miracles and why they spend so much time praying for their god to intervene in daily human affairs.  In the context of our rape, not only did god create the people involved, he knew that a rape was occurring, he was present when it occurred, and…he did nothing to stop it when has the power to do so.  Christians must admit that their god could have prevented this rape or they must admit that he is not omnipotent.

Lastly,  Christians believe that their god is omnibenevolent.  He is all good.  Everything he does is good.  Their god can do no wrong.  In the context of our rape, this god created the people, he knew a rape was going to happen with a child as the result, was present during the rape, did not stop the rape, and now sees this entire episode of events  as a good thing.

Back to Mourdock’s comment:  “I came to realize life is a gift from God and I think even when life begins in that horrible situation of rape, that it is something that God intended to happen.”  Mourdock is making the ONLY statement that a “good” and devout Christian can make.  Period.  End of Story.

The indisputable facts of the matter, from the Christian viewpoint, are that we now have a god that created a woman knowing she was going to be raped, a male knowing he was going to rape this woman, a child who was going to be the result of this rape, and was present when this action occurred.  While watching this rape in progress and knowing about beforehand, this god did nothing to stop it, and thinks the entire scenario is a good thing.  The Christian CAN’t argue against any of these claims unless they admit their god is not one of or all of the following: an eternal creator, omniscient, omnipresent, omnipotent, and omnibenevolent.   Mourdock made the only sensible comment a devout Christian can make.  God must want this child to live.  The product of this foreseen event is the child.  Mourdock is just being a good Christian.

Well I am not a Christian.  I am an atheist.  I do not believe in an eternal creator, omniscient, omnipresent, omnipotent and omnibenevolent god.  I have no problem pointing out that the entire story that I detailed above is complete and utter bullshit, that Christianity is a bullshit religion, that Christianity provides an excuse for inexcusable behavior (rape in this case), that most Christians aren’t “good” or devout followers of their faith and really have no clue what their religion states.  If they did, there would currently be a mass exodus of people from Christianity.

The problem I have with this whole scenario is that no one on either side of the political aisle or the main stream media is pointing this out.  Why?  Because it is still not acceptable to criticize Christianity in this country and to point out the fact that Mourdock is just being a good Christian would naturally lead rational people to criticize and reject Christianity.  No politician is going to attempt that move, particularly two weeks before an election.  Nor will any media outlet.  This is a tragedy.

The simple fact is this: The Christian must either come out in support of Mourdock’s comment or admit that their god cannot exist as they believe him to exist.  I sincerely hope that they choose the latter.

Thanks for reading.  I look forward to your comments.

—-RB

If you have a blog please feel free to promote it on my “Promote Your Blog” page above.

If you would like to share your story of how you became an atheist, please do that on my “Share your Atheism Story” forum.  Our stories may help to encourage others with similar feelings to know that life is more than just okay without god(s).

If you have not yet checked out Alltop.com’s Atheism Blogs….what are you waiting for?

 

17 thoughts on “Richard Mourdock is a Better Christian Than Most

  1. Ahab from United States

    I've read some columns claiming that Mourdock's theology is flawed because it is incompatible with a "good" God. I think the Christians who wrote those columns are well-meaning people who, in their own way, are calling out Mourdock's disgusting statement. However, I think your point is a good one — all sorts of theodicy problems erupt when Christians try to label God omnipotent and omniscient.

    Reply
  2. Aspentroll from Clive, AB, Canada

    A perfect explanation of the Christian, Islamic and Jewish religious problem, they are damned if they do and damned if they don't totally accept their own dogma. Actually it's laughable. They go around criticizing everyone who has any different view of religion than they do. I can't calculate the number of times I've been told i am going to hell for my atheistic views. The only hope they have is when they finally realize that being dogmatic in their views won't work for them and they begin to think rationally about one of the greatest hoaxes ever pulled on mankind.
    World War 3 is not far in the future if they don't get it right.

    Reply
  3. Loren Miller from Bedford, OH, United States

    Another way to read all of this is that it's god's bat, ball, and game, and he gets to do whatever he wants with them … meaning US … and once again, I am reminded of the spoiled brat, magnifying glass in hand, targeting the local anthill.

    When man's morals are more lenient, more considerate, and more reasonable than god's morals, where does the purpose of a god as regards morals lie? Nowhere that I can see.

    Reply
  4. Grung_e_Gene from Wheaton, IL, United States

    Here's how to Tehodicy this up:

    Humans have Free-Will. God allows bad actions so that every human soul (ignoring the virtuous pagans caught in purgatory) the chance to accept god. Those who don't go to hell, ergo the unrepentant rapist goes to hell. There's your punishment. Meanwhile the aborted baby could be Beethoven (the Beethove or Einstein was amost aborted lie was bandied about during the 80's and 90's) and thus by killing the rape baby you are depriving the world of potential.

    Not my idea but what I've gleamed from frequent discussions with the cultists. Good post and reasoning!

    Reply
  5. AndrewHall from Austin, TX, United States

    Christians should state clearly what a vast majority must believe: The baby (as they would frame it) should not suffer for the sins of the rapist father. If there is an abortion then murder is added to the tragedy of the rape. The pain of the mother is considerable, but nothing in comparision of murdering an innocent child. In short: Mom buck up.

    Of course, I don't think such an attitude would win votes outside very small enclaves of faith-based loons.

    Reply
  6. AchelorOfArts from Turku, Western Finland, Finland

    I came across a quote from Seneca (the philosopher) back in the 1st century CE: "Religion is viewed by the common people as true, the wise as false, and by politicians as useful." Considering that the religious view humans as magical, and that even an unborn child is somehow endowed with a "soul", a religious concept for which there is no evidence – even if they could define it in terms that could be tested – there's no point in debating with the religious zealot. The world-view of the religious is so far removed from reality-based. Ethics aren't dictated by their fantasies, but by human society.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

CommentLuv badge